Draft Minutes of the Church Council Meeting

 

On:  Thursday 08 July 2004 - 20:00

At: St Marc’s Church Centre

 

Present :

Stephen Coffin (chaplain), Craig Alciati, Elizabeth Cherhal (deputy secretary), Lara Confort (churchwarden), Alison Coulavin (synod rep), Claire Naylor, Segun Odunlade, Richard Sheppard (treasurer)

Absent :

 

Excused :

David Bailey, Alan and Valerie Golton, Mark Lewis, Troy Simoni

 

 

Agenda:

 

43.

Prayer & apologies (please notify Chaplain)

(2 min. - Standing Item)

44.

Approval of minutes of last meeting and any matters arising

(3 min. - Standing Item)

45.

Treasurer's report

(3 min. - Standing Item)

46.

Committee reports

     46a – confirm church donation to Emmanuel College (John Lenton) or to another

               bona fide organisation.(follow on from item 32a)

     46b - No other committee reports.

(4 min. - Standing Item)

47.

Define maximum yearly amount above which church investments are considered to be major investments.

(4min. - follow on from postponed item 19 & item 34)

48.

Additional service

     - questionnaire feedback and resolution of times & dates

(28 min. - proposed by Chaplain - follow on from items 4a, 21,33)

49.

Review of past & future events

     49a - Church Away Weekend evaluation and assessment

     (proposed by Elisabeth - follow on from postponed items 25a,38a)

     49b – No other Events

(5 min. - Standing Item)

50.

Church project(s) – nothing up for discussion

(0 min. - Standing Item)

51.

Church Web Site – The church web site is “on the blink” again.

How to proceed with the domain name & web space?

(6 min – proposed by Chaplain)

52.

Editorial Committee for Church Magazine, “St Marc's Matters”.

(6 minutes - follow on from postponed item 22 & item 35)

53.

Church Committees (Evangelism; Events; Music; Social/catering; Building; Finance)

Would you please volunteer for the committee you would prefer to join or create?

(10 min. - Follow on from item 7 & postponed items 20 & 40)

54.

Any other matters

     54a - Church Video Projector - Practical questions(proposed by Secretary)

     54b - Church Publicity Material – Logos & Tee-Shirts…(proposed by Alison)

     54c - Making Birthday’s Special – choose a hymn (proposed by Alison)

     54d – Programming the next meetings (proposed by Secretary).

(10 min. - Standing Item)

55.

Closing Prayer

(Time as needed. - Standing Item)

 

Meeting

 

44.

Approval of minutes of last meeting and any matters arising

The minutes of the last meeting were adopted unanimously.

45.

Treasurer's report

The treasurer does not consider that it is urgent to give  a report to the congregation at the time being. Church finances are relatively stable. Donations and money from pecusa (?) are coming in. However, the SMIG has been raised in France, and an increase in the chaplains’s salary should be considered. Social security payments have increased (will increase?) by 2.5% this year. The treasurer has been invited to attend the annual meeting of “cavimac” (social security system for clergy). This is unanimously approved.

46.

Committee reports

  46a – confirm church donation to Emmanuel College (John Lenton) or to another

            bona fide organisation.(follow on from item 32a).

A sum of 700E was agreed, which could either go toward financing part of a sholarship, or buying 2 washing machines. The council voted for the purchase of 2 washing machines.

47.

Define maximum yearly amount above which church investments are considered to be major investments.

The amount was fixed at 300E.

48.

Additional service

As suggested by the chaplain, due to the absence of many councillors, no decision should be made, but discussion should take place in a prayerful and loving atmosphere, to further new ideas following the questionnaire feedback.

(chaplains’s report below)

     - questionnaire feedback and resolution of times & dates

Questionnaires:  41 returned, plus 2 e-mails (some are from couples filling in only one form)

(Where numbers don't add up to the full number it's because people did not answer the question.)

 

Would you support the proposal to have a 2nd service even if you wouldn't attend?  29 yes   12 no

Would you attend this kind of contemporary service instead of the current services?  1 regularly  16 sometimes   14 no

or in addition to the current services?    1 regularly   19 sometimes  15 no

Would you like to attend a different service on different weeks?  25 yes   16 no

Do you have friends or contacts you would invite to such a service?  16 yes   25 no

Do they have children for whom we'd need to make provision?   10 yes    29 no

Would you appreciate "Holy Communion" weekly if possible?  10 yes    30 don't mind

 

Option of running services one after the other with a coffee break between.

Would you welcome any of these options?  24 A   14 B   21 C   12 D   7 E   12 F

Would any encourage friends to come?       16 A     9 B     7 C    4 D   2 E     5 F

Would any stop you coming?                       2 A     2 B     6 C    6 D   8 E   10 F

Would you welcome meeting with people from both services over coffee?   37 yes     1 no

Would you worship at one service and help at the other?      21 yes     8 no      4 sometimes

 

We could offer the new service at a completely different time. 

Saturday evening   8 yes  (5 of whom might bring guests)

Sunday afternoon  4 yes  (2 of whom might bring guests)

Sunday evening    21 yes (18 of whom might bring guests)

   1=5pm; 3=6pm; 1=6to6.30pm; 2=6to7pm; 1=6to8pm; 1=6.30pm; 1=6.30to7pm; 1=8.30pm; 1=after6pm

No other times/days were suggested

 

How about holding "seeker-sensitive" on Sunday & one for more mature Christians at another time?  20 against    7 pro

 

Running services in parallel

Would you positively like this sort of pattern?  16 yes    22 no

Would you tolerate this pattern if implemented?           10 no

Would this encourage your non-Church going friends to come?  15 yes

Would you move from one service to the other at 11.15 or 11.50?   5 yes

We'd need to use two different rooms.  Any comments?   13 against using "grand volume"

 

Would you help sometimes at either service with

Children's work                   5 at contemporary service   14 at current service

Setting up & other tasks    14 at contemporary service   19 at current service

Church meals

Would you help with this if we continued with it on 1st Sundays?   19 yes

Importance of midweek meetings - 12 commented in agreement with these being important

 

How would you feel about stopping the family service, since our children don't like it & we lack gifted people to lead it?

2 avoid this service;  3 want it stopped;   4 are happy for it to stop;  2 defer to those with children;

8 want it to continue;  2 suggest replacing it with a monthly contemporary service; 4 enjoy it but are willing for it to stop;

3 want it at least occasionally;  3 suggest looking at the format afresh, with more participation, testimony, groups, etc.

 

Important to underline that the biggest concern expressed by doubters or those against was that we might split the Church. 

Several expressed that they value our diversity and the unity we have sought to maintain within that.

 

Council deliberations

Given the survey results, it seems there is yet no clear consensus in favour of any particular changed pattern for Sunday mornings.  The most popular "one service following the other" pattern A with a 9h30 start will not be possible because it would clash with both Reformed & Catholic services, and the Centre has made known that this will not be acceptable.  The Centre President has expressed strong reservations about our overlapping at all with the others, which option C would also require.

Objections to using the Grand Volume for a parallel service are strong, which would make this option difficult.

The option of offering a Sunday evening contemporary service in addition drew the most positive indications of this being attractive to outsiders (18), and was welcomed by 21 people.

The Council concluded that we should try to investigate this Sunday evening option further.  Stephen was asked to prepare a follow-up set of questions about this option, including practical issues about feeding children, etc., including encouraging those without children to consider what times they would support if it helped those with.  He was also asked to solicit more questionnaire replies.

Stephen was also mandated to work on specific plans for the first services, with those who'd like to help him, with a view to having some outlines ready for the September meeting, when we will discuss further and decide the best way forward.

 

49.

Review of past & future events

     49a - Church Away Weekend evaluation and assessment

It transpires from return of questionnaires and general discussion that:

  • Most people prefer to hold the weekend in a location near to Grenoble. Other sites suggested were “Combe des cimes” or St Nizier.
  • It is better to hold the weekend on a Saturday with no school.
  • Feedbck on the content of the away weekend (talks, discussion groups) was very positive.

     49b – Men’s supper:

  • One of the purposes of the men’s supper, apart from general fellowship, is outreach. It was suggested that a short abstract of each talk would be a good idea to encourage participation.
  • Smaller tables would facilitate deeper discussion.

 

50.

Church project(s) – We are still awaiting news about Cécile Forestini’s house.

 

51.

Church Web Site – The church web site is “on the blink” again.

How to proceed with the domain name & web space?

After a short period during which we had managed to get the church domain name “grenoble-church.org” back pointing to the proper St Marc’s content (actually on Stephen’s personal “wanadoo” pages), the name was purchased again by John Sanders who has it pointing to content having nothing to do with St Marc’s church. It seems we have to give up the name “grenoble-church.org” and secure ourselves another one.

It was explained that a .com domain name was not a good idea, because .com is for business and we do not want give the (misguided) impression that we do business. It was decided not only to obtain a new name (such as grenoblechurch, or church-grenoble), to clearly specify that the name belongs to the church association,that the conctact person is the chaplain, but also to set up a website with a good amount of disk space. Craig Alciati and Elizabeth Cherhal are mandated to deal with this.

 

52.

Editorial Committee for Church Magazine, “St Marc's Matters”.

Alison reported that Suzanne Ware and Elizabeth Cherhal have agreed to work on the editorial committee for the church magazine. A contact has also been made with Sam Hughes (by profession a journalist), who should also be able to give sound advice.

Elizabeth suggested that a member of the clergy should be consulted for general orientation. It was decided that the committee could seek advice from Stephen or Alan when needed. The committee should meet twice a term, once for planning the coming issue and once for editing it.

54.

Any other matters

     54a - Church Video Projector - Practical questions

The video projector has now been purchased.

     54b - Church Publicity Material – Logos & Tee-Shirts

Alison proposed to make some publicity material for the church. 3 supports were suggested: T shirts (portraying the church logo), address labels (such as many charities propose), and postcards (portraying one of the quilts). Some reticence was expressed about T shirts. It was thought that they might not be much of a success with teenagers. The other items were thought to be interesting, and Craig (postcards) and Elizabeth (T shirts) are to make enquiries about prices.

     54c - Making Birthday’s Special – choose a hymn. This idea, proposed by

Alison, was that a person could choose their favorite hymn to be sung on their birthday. This idea was rejected, mainly on the grounds that hymns were chosen to go with the content of the service.

     54d – Programming the next meetings (proposed by Secretary).

The next meeting is to be held on the September 8th at 20:00  in St Marc’s.